search

Enzo Wallart vs Maxwell Mckennon Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wallart vs Mckennon analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

Enzo Wallart vs Maxwell Mckennon Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Wallart 0 - 0 Mckennon

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wallart has won 46.99% of points on their second serve, while Mckennon has won 49.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wallart, in recent form, has won 52.96% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mckennon has won 47.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.33% and 31.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Wallart has saved 58.39% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mckennon has saved 55.41% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Wallart has won 55.77% of matches played (W/L 29/ 23), with Mckennon winning 60% (W/L 18/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Wallart has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 16/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 13/ 14). Mckennon has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 22/ 23).
  • Player level: In the last year, Wallart has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.5% of matches (W/L 23/ 17), where as Mckennon has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wallart has played against opponents with an average rank of 191.85 while Mckennon has played against players with an average rank of 102.8.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wallart has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mckennon has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Wallart has converted 46.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mckennon has converted 40% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Enzo Wallart

1

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

1

Minor

634

Rank

594

High

27

Age

R

Plays

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

N/A

Rank

High

22

Age

Plays

Maxwell Mckennon

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W L W W L W W L L L

Form

W W L L L W W W L L

54% (103-86)

Career Total W/L

51% (25-24)

48% (11-12)

YTD W/L

54% (7-6)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Enzo Wallart vs Maxwell Mckennon For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Wallart VS Mckennon

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Wallart VS Mckennon H2h Matches played

No H2H Matches Available

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Enzo Wallart Maxwell Mckennon
YTD W/L 48% (11/12) 54% (7/6)
Sets Win/Loss 52% (27/25) 50% (15/15)
Games Win/Loss 52% (255/237) 51% (132/127)
Hard Win/Loss 48% (11/12) 54% (7/6)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.41 0.29
Aces Total 99 36
DFs per game 0.25 0.26
DFs Total 61 32
Avg Match Time 1:53:10 1:26:29
Avg Opp Rank 107.04 172.77
1st Serve % 63% (964/1528) 63% (457/722)
1st Serve W% 68% (654/964) 65% (297/457)
2nd Serve W% 47% (265/564) 49% (130/265)
BPs Won% Total 47% (65/139) 40% (26/65)
Return Pts W% 40% (596/1499) 38% (263/692)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 50% (2/2) 57% (4/3)
Futures W/L 47% (9/10) 50% (3/3)
Best of 3 Sets W% 52% (11/21) 54% (7/13)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 43% (3/7) 0% (0/1)
Deciding Set W% 38% (3/8) 75% (3/4)
1st set W, W 100% (10/10) 100% (5/5)
1st set W, L 0% (10/0) 0% (5/0)
1st set L, W 8% (13/1) 25% (8/2)

Enzo Wallart Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
Player
Enzo Wallart
53% ( 26 of 49)
1st Serve %
65% ( 35 of 54)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
69% ( 18 of 26)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 21 of 35)
61% ( 14 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
21% ( 4 of 19)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
35% ( 17 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 29 of 54)
61
Total Points Won
42
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Leo Vithoontien
Player
Enzo Wallart
66% ( 73 of 110)
1st Serve %
57% ( 55 of 97)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
9
64% ( 47 of 73)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 40 of 55)
62% ( 23 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 18 of 42)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
44% ( 4 of 9)
36% ( 40 of 110)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 39 of 97)
109
Total Points Won
98
L
7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Leonardo Rossi
Player
Enzo Wallart
66% ( 58 of 88)
1st Serve %
70% ( 59 of 84)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
71% ( 41 of 58)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 34 of 59)
60% ( 18 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 15 of 25)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
33% ( 29 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 35 of 84)
94
Total Points Won
78
L
6-4 4-6 6-3 H2H
R2
W
6-2 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Enzo Wallart
Player
Mitchell Harper
65% ( 44 of 68)
1st Serve %
56% ( 30 of 54)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
77% ( 34 of 44)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 19 of 30)
50% ( 12 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 14 of 24)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
32% ( 22 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 21 of 54)
67
Total Points Won
55
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Max Wiskandt
Player
Enzo Wallart
78% ( 64 of 82)
1st Serve %
70% ( 55 of 79)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
63% ( 40 of 64)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 32 of 55)
50% ( 9 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
40% ( 33 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 37 of 79)
86
Total Points Won
75
L
6-4 3-6 6-1 H2H
R2
cross
Enzo Wallart
Player
Niklas Schell
79% ( 44 of 56)
1st Serve %
52% ( 24 of 46)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
73% ( 32 of 44)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 17 of 24)
42% ( 5 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 9 of 22)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
34% ( 19 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 20 of 46)
57
Total Points Won
45
W
6-1 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Enzo Wallart
Player
James Beaven
67% ( 55 of 82)
1st Serve %
64% ( 51 of 80)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
73% ( 40 of 55)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 33 of 51)
59% ( 16 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
34% ( 10 of 29)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
32% ( 26 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 37 of 80)
93
Total Points Won
69
W
5-7 6-1 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Paul Jubb
Player
Enzo Wallart
67% ( 16 of 24)
1st Serve %
63% ( 15 of 24)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
94% ( 15 of 16)
1st Serve Won
40% ( 6 of 15)
38% ( 3 of 8)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
25% ( 6 of 24)
Rtn Points Won
63% ( 15 of 24)
33
Total Points Won
15
L
6-0 1-1 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Enzo Wallart
Player
Toby Martin
70% ( 96 of 138)
1st Serve %
65% ( 84 of 129)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
67% ( 64 of 96)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 61 of 84)
52% ( 22 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 21 of 45)
22% ( 2 of 9)
Break Points Won
27% ( 3 of 11)
38% ( 52 of 138)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 47 of 129)
133
Total Points Won
134
W
7-6(5) 5-7 7-6(1) H2H

Maxwell Mckennon Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Collin Altamirano
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
70% ( 31 of 44)
1st Serve %
56% ( 36 of 64)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
87% ( 27 of 31)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 22 of 36)
77% ( 10 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 14 of 28)
25% ( 3 of 12)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
16% ( 7 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 28 of 64)
65
Total Points Won
43
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Learner Tien
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
68% ( 44 of 65)
1st Serve %
56% ( 30 of 54)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
64% ( 28 of 44)
1st Serve Won
40% ( 12 of 30)
52% ( 11 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 11 of 24)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
11% ( 1 of 9)
40% ( 26 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 31 of 54)
70
Total Points Won
49
L
6-4 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
Alexander Chang
71% ( 58 of 82)
1st Serve %
57% ( 47 of 82)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
62% ( 36 of 58)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 31 of 47)
50% ( 12 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 16 of 35)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
41% ( 34 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 35 of 82)
83
Total Points Won
81
W
6-3 2-6 6-2 H2H
QF
W
6-3 6-3 H2H
Q1
W
6-3 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Collin Altamirano
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
63% ( 40 of 63)
1st Serve %
59% ( 36 of 61)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
75% ( 30 of 40)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 26 of 36)
52% ( 12 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 11 of 25)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
33% ( 21 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 24 of 61)
66
Total Points Won
58
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Liam Broady
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
60% ( 34 of 57)
1st Serve %
51% ( 23 of 45)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
88% ( 30 of 34)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 15 of 23)
48% ( 11 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 9 of 22)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
28% ( 16 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 21 of 45)
62
Total Points Won
40
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
57% ( 35 of 61)
1st Serve %
62% ( 44 of 71)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
66% ( 23 of 35)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 29 of 44)
62% ( 16 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 8 of 27)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
13% ( 1 of 8)
36% ( 22 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 34 of 71)
73
Total Points Won
59
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
Keegan Smith
66% ( 39 of 59)
1st Serve %
65% ( 36 of 55)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77% ( 30 of 39)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 23 of 36)
55% ( 11 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 9 of 19)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
31% ( 18 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 23 of 55)
64
Total Points Won
50
W
6-4 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
George Goldhoff
55% ( 39 of 71)
1st Serve %
54% ( 43 of 80)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
11
74% ( 29 of 39)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 28 of 43)
69% ( 22 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 17 of 37)
46% ( 6 of 13)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
28% ( 20 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 35 of 80)
86
Total Points Won
65
W
6-7(1) 6-2 6-0 H2H

Wallart Vs Mckennon Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Wallart are available here and Mckennon photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions